Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1064

reference
600-tree-1
name
1064
tree-preservation-order

undefined

600-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.020110 50.879822)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.020053 50.879816,-1.020055 50.879827,-1.020063 50.879837,-1.020076 50.879845,-1.020091 50.879851,-1.020109 50.879853,-1.020127 50.879851,-1.020143 50.879846,-1.020155 50.879838,-1.020164 50.879828,-1.020167 50.879817,-1.020164 50.879806,-1.020156 50.879796,-1.020144 50.879788,-1.020128 50.879783,-1.020110 50.879781,-1.020093 50.879782,-1.020077 50.879787,-1.020064 50.879795,-1.020056 50.879805,-1.020053 50.879816)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL